The NS has announced that train tickets are going to become 10% more expensive - why? Some relevant facts before I go into this: 
The NS is 100% owned by the Dutch government Traffic jams on Dutch roads have only increased A car ride from Utrecht to Amsterdam emits 8874% more than a train ride Proportional price increases hit the poorest the hardest Now let’s look at these points individually. 
100% government ownership: The NS was created to serve the public – as a government-run entity, its duty is to balance financial viability with widespread accessibility and affordability. This is the same government that subsidizes fossil fuels with €37.5 billion per year, in part by not taxing jet fuel. Why then should people planning a family visit on the weekend have to think twice about going merely because the price tag of a train ticket no longer fits in their budget? The lack of government action not only showcases a disregard for equitable access but also questions the political commitments of a government which has promised more support for its people and the climate. 
Traffic jams: The increasing traffic jams on Dutch roads are a clear signal that more needs to be done to encourage public transport usage. With the recent announcement of a 10% price increase, my social media has been flooded with frustrated commuters saying they want to leave the car at home but can’t afford the train. A 1-day return ticket for Den Bosch - Amsterdam will soon cost €40. 
The climate argument: This one speaks for itself, but the Dutch trains (which already run on 100% wind energy) are far more sustainable than car rides. 
Social inequality: The 10% fare increase disproportionately impacts the poorest, highlighting a serious issue of social equality and mobility access. Public transport – ideally an equalizer – is becoming less affordable and accessible, especially for those most in need. By raising train travel costs, NS not only risks widening the mobility gap but also deepens social inequalities.